Ir al menú de navegación principal Ir al contenido principal Ir al pie de página del sitio
Tabula

Studia

Núm. 28 (2025): Archivar emergencias: los documentos en conflictos y catástrofes

La integración de la gestión del riesgo de catástrofes y el ordenamiento archivístico para la protección de los documentos vitales de los ciudadanos

DOI
https://doi.org/10.51598/tab.1094
Enviado
febrero 13, 2026
Publicado
2026-02-27

Resumen

Los documentos vitales contienen información valiosa, constituyen pruebas y acreditan la propiedad de los bienes. La gestión del riesgo de desastres rara vez contabiliza los daños y pérdidas de documentos vitales. Este artículo ofrece una revisión exhaustiva de las prácticas de protección de documentos. A través de una metodología cualitativa examina la integración de la gestión del riesgo de desastres y la gestión documental en el marco del Records Continuum. El estudio identifica los procesos clave para protegerlos, incluyendo la prevención, la mitigación, la respuesta y la recuperación. Factores como la predisposición a sufrir desastres, la insuficiencia de infraestructuras, la escasa concienciación pública y las limitaciones financieras agravan los riesgos para los documentos. Por consiguiente, las estrategias de protección deben tener en cuenta los contextos socioeconómicos, físicos y culturales de las poblaciones afectadas. Los resultados ponen de relieve que la protección de los documentos vitales es una responsabilidad compartida. Al integrar los principios de gestión del riesgo en los marcos archivísticos, esta investigación ofrece recomendaciones prácticas para mejorar las prácticas de conservación de los documentos. 

Vital records contain valuable information, constitute evidence, and establish ownership of assets. Disaster risk management rarely accounts for the damage to and loss of vital records. This article provides a comprehensive review of records protection practices. Using a qualitative methodology, it examines the integration of disaster risk management and records management within the framework of the Records Continuum. The study identifies key processes for protecting vital records, including prevention, mitigation, response, and recovery. Factors such as exposure to disasters, inadequate infrastructure, low levels of public awareness, and financial constraints exacerbate the risks faced by these records. Consequently, protection strategies must take into account the socio-economic, physical, and cultural contexts of the affected populations. The findings highlight that safeguarding vital records is a shared responsibility. By integrating disaster risk management principles into archival frameworks, this research offers practical recommendations for improving records preservation practices. 

Estadísticas globales ℹ️

Totales acumulados desde su publicación
24
Visualizaciones
2
Descargas
26
Total

Citas

  1. Assarroudi, A., Nabavi, F. H., Armat, M. R., Ebadi, A., & Vaismoradi, M. (2018). Directed Qualitative Content Analysis: The Description and Elaboration of Its Underpinning Methods and Data Analysis Process. Journal of Research in Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987117741667
  2. Barnes, G., & Riverstone, G. (2009). Exploring Vulnerability and Resilience in Land Tenure Systems after Hurricanes Mitch and Ivan. University of Florida.
  3. Blaikie, P., Cannon, T., Davis, I., & Wisner, B. (2004). At Risk Natural Hazards, People’s Vulnerability and Disasters. Routlegde. BNPB. (2022). Indeks Risiko Bencana Indonesia (IRBI) Tahun 2022 (1ª ed., Vol. 1). BNPB.
  4. Brown, O., Crawford, A., & Hammil, A. (2006). Natural Disasters and Resource Right: Building resilience, rebuilding lives. International Institute for Sustainable Development.
  5. Cardona, O.-D., van Aalst, M. K., Birkmann, J., Fordham, M., McGregor, G., Perez, R., Pulwarty, R. S., Schipper, E. L. F., Sinh, B. T., Décamps, H., Keim, M., Davis, I., Ebi, K. L., Lavell, A., Mechler, R., Murray, V., Pelling, M., Pohl, J., Smith, A.-O., & Thomalla, F. (2012). Determinants of Risk: Exposure and Vulnerability. In Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation (págs. 65–108). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139177245.005
  6. Carter, W. N. (2008). Disaster Management: A Disaster Manager’s Handbook. Asian Development Bank.
  7. CRED. (2019). International Emergency Disasters Database (EM-DAT). http://www.emdat.be/database
  8. Flynn, S. J. A. (2001). The Records Continuum Model in Context and its Implications for Archival Practice. Journal of the Society of Archivists, 22(1), 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/00379810120037522
  9. IPCC. (2018). Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the Impacts of Global Warming of 1.5°C above Pre-Industrial Levels and Related Global Greenhouse Gas Emission Pathways, in the Context of Strengthening the Global Response to the Threat of Climate Change, Sustainable Development, and Efforts to Eradicate Poverty.
  10. Khan, H., Vasilescu, L. G., & Khan, A. (2008). Disaster Management CYCLE – a theoretical approach. Management and Marketing Journal, 6(1), 43–50. https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aio:manmar:v:6:y:2008:i:1:p:43-50
  11. Leckie, S. (2009). Leader of the pack: Who will take the lead on post-conflict HLP issues? In Uncharted Territory (págs. 95–106). Practical Action Publishing. https://doi.org/10.3362/9781780440408.006
  12. Mayring, P., & Fenzl, T. (2014). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. In Handbuch Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung (págs. 543–556). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-18939-0_38
  13. McKemmish, S. (2016). Yesterday, today and tomorrow: a continuum of responsibility. Proceedings of the Records Management Association of Australia 14th National Convention.
  14. Nojavan, M., Salehi, E., & Omidvar, B. (2018). Conceptual change of disaster management models: A thematic analysis. Jàmbá: Journal of Disaster Risk Studies, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.4102/jamba.v10i1.451
  15. Otto, F. E. L., Philip, S., Kew, S., Li, S., King, A., & Cullen, H. (2018). Attributing high-impact extreme events across timescales—a case study of four different types of events. Climatic Change, 149(3–4), 399–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2258-3
  16. UNDRR. (2015). Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction 2015.
  17. UNDRR. (2022). Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction 2022: Our World at Risk: Transforming Governance for a Resilient Future.
  18. Upward, F. (2000). Modelling the continuum as paradigm shift in recordkeeping and archiving processes, and beyond Ö a personal reflection. Records Management Journal, 10(3), 115–139. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000007259
  19. von Benda-Beckmann, F., von Benda-Beckmann K, & Wiber, M. (2006). The Properties of Property. In Changing Properties of Property. Oxford.
  20. Williams, S. (2006). Getting Back Home Impact on Property Rights of the Indian Ocean Earthquake-Tsunami 2004 (122).
  21. Wisner, B. (2016). Vulnerability as Concept, Model, Metric, and Tool. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Natural Hazard Science. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199389407.013.25

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.